First of all sonny the original headline reads them not playing in 2021, and you're acknowledging it by talking about how much they're benefiting by not doing so, so no I'm not wrong. Who the hell takes two years off and comes back to where they were? Not in this landscape.PolarBear wrote: ↑Fri Apr 02, 2021 2:04 pmMGB01 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 10:18 am There won't be a CFL to partner with, so the headline is actually correct.
Just in the last few weeks since this became public the gradual shift that the CFL is in some sort of position of strength (spoiler: neither are) is a laugh. History means nothing when you're hellbent on gnawing off your only potential lifeline to "save face".
History of the CFL is everything. So you are wrong! The CFL is literally not in a threatening or threatened position. Teams losing $$ is irrelevant. There are millions of examples how CFL teams are actually benefiting from no-CFL season. These are extremely knowledgeable businessmen in Canada and many have the best of the best lawyers working for them If you think a CFL team really lost $7 million out of the bank (Winnipeg Blue Bombers) then you need to contact me for a business lesson.
The reason why the CFL even has looked at the XFL are the plans in place to grow the CFL overall to compete w/ the NFL to retain players and help grown their markets so franchises are self-sustained to grow their off-field ventures.
Two I never said anything about money so, would you like a do-over on that wrongness allegation?
Three lifeline is about playing in 2021 so they can actually both walk and chew gum (play and not go into the tank).
It continues.................