I don't think it's any more or less transparent -- my point is that it's smart to park the Bandits brand in case you do ever go back.
Bandits on the move?
-
- MVP
- Posts: 2804
- Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 3:57 pm
Re: Bandits on the move?
2020 East Division Champions
2021 February Monthly T-Shirt Giveaway Champion
2021 February Monthly T-Shirt Giveaway Champion
-
- MVP
- Posts: 2906
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2019 6:15 pm
Re: Bandits on the move?
I wonder when we'll find out what the Showboats look like uniform wise?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2021 10:53 am
-
- MVP
- Posts: 2906
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2019 6:15 pm
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2021 10:53 am
Re: Bandits on the move?
-
- MVP
- Posts: 2906
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2019 6:15 pm
Re: Bandits on the move?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2021 10:53 am
Re: Bandits on the move?
I’m not a big fan of the old logo tbh but I’d like to see it on the helmets to connect with the past. But overall I’d say new showboats branding> og branding
-
- MVP
- Posts: 2906
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2019 6:15 pm
Re: Bandits on the move?
Whenever the USFL decides to expand again, one of the teams we know will be the Tampa Bay Bandits, but that may not be until USF gets the on-campus stadium that they are trying to build. Plus, I don't think the Bandits will be the last USFL team to go "on hiatus" as it would not surprise me if the Maulers do the same after 2023 if the plan is for the 8 teams to move into their own stadiums.
The Gamblers to Austin would be a fantastic option, especially playing at the Austin FC stadium. But it seems to me that the USFL wants to bring back as many of the cities of the old USFL as they can, which could be a mistake on their part. The USFL going to new cities that were not a part of the old league could be fun. The Gamblers to Austin and The Maulers to Columbus (Ohio) could add a little spice to the USFL.
However, the USFL seems reluctant to do that and instead wants to replicate as many cities in the old USFL as they can because they could have easily decided to continue the Spring League format of teams but no cities, which could have led to newer cities whenever they decided to place those city names with the teams. You then could have had places like Austin, Columbus and Raleigh to start rather than Houston, Pittsburgh and Tampa Bay.
The Gamblers to Austin would be a fantastic option, especially playing at the Austin FC stadium. But it seems to me that the USFL wants to bring back as many of the cities of the old USFL as they can, which could be a mistake on their part. The USFL going to new cities that were not a part of the old league could be fun. The Gamblers to Austin and The Maulers to Columbus (Ohio) could add a little spice to the USFL.
However, the USFL seems reluctant to do that and instead wants to replicate as many cities in the old USFL as they can because they could have easily decided to continue the Spring League format of teams but no cities, which could have led to newer cities whenever they decided to place those city names with the teams. You then could have had places like Austin, Columbus and Raleigh to start rather than Houston, Pittsburgh and Tampa Bay.