Panthers must be confident in Barrierer, I hope he gets a shot to play some. Maulers have a better qb room now then they started the year with imo, may help them a lot next season
Patterson and Lauletta released
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2021 10:53 am
-
- MVP
- Posts: 6712
- Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2019 2:27 pm
Patterson and Lauletta SIGNED
NJ signs Lauletta
NOLA signs Patterson
No way the league is letting those guys go. Do you think they had to signed the new contract amendment?
NOLA signs Patterson
No way the league is letting those guys go. Do you think they had to signed the new contract amendment?
-
- Quarterback
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2021 7:07 pm
Re: Patterson and Lauletta released
That’s a good question. I’m going to say that by changing teams would warrant signing that new agreement. I would think the league wants every opportunity to lock players in so I would think this would qualify.
I was also surprised the Panthers let Patterson go over Lynch. I was also surprised the Generals picked up Lauletta. Does this point to a more significant injury to Deandre Johnson? I never heard an injury report on him last week.
I was also surprised the Panthers let Patterson go over Lynch. I was also surprised the Generals picked up Lauletta. Does this point to a more significant injury to Deandre Johnson? I never heard an injury report on him last week.
- johnnyangryfuzzball
- Head Coach
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2019 8:22 pm
Re: Patterson and Lauletta released
Reminder of the wording: Patterson and Lauletta didn't re-sign, they were claimed of waivers. In other words, this is the USFL engaging in tortious interference.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2021 10:53 am
Re: Patterson and Lauletta released
Or those teams coaching staffs had those qbs as high ranked ones going into the draft and saw them as talented but misused…johnnyangryfuzzball wrote: ↑Fri May 27, 2022 10:09 am Reminder of the wording: Patterson and Lauletta didn't re-sign, they were claimed of waivers. In other words, this is the USFL engaging in tortious interference.
- SamTheRam28
- Quarterback
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 11:16 pm
Re: Patterson and Lauletta released
Or Michigan didn't want Patterson anymore because Paxton Lynch is healthy and they like Josh Love but New Orleans did because Kyle Sloter is banged up, and Pittsburgh didn't want Lauletta anymore because they like Vad Lee and Roland Rivers but New Jersey wanted him because De'Andre Johnson is injured.johnnyangryfuzzball wrote: ↑Fri May 27, 2022 10:09 am Reminder of the wording: Patterson and Lauletta didn't re-sign, they were claimed of waivers. In other words, this is the USFL engaging in tortious interference.
Do you think the NFL is "engaging in tortious interference" every time somebody is claimed off waivers too?
St. Louis BattleHawks